tech Technical archive gt_glaze

song_title

In 2000, I completed my Diploma of Art (Ceramics) at ANU Canberra School of Art with the goal to produce simple thrown forms with an interesting glazed surface. I was initially attracted to the high felspar iron reduction glazes of the Chinese Song dynasty (12th-13th century). I chose eight glazes.

The Testing Procedure
The initial tests were 500 gram batches based on potash felspar with a yellow iron oxide line blend from base to 3% in 0.5% increments. Glaze was brushed on to tiles with thickness built up towards the top. Tests were fired in a gas kiln to Orton Cone 8-9 over eight to ten hours with moderate reduction commencing at 1000C and maintained for at least four hours.

Glazes 1 - 3 showed bluish iron tones, especially at the 1.5% concentration. Glaze 2 developed a typical ‘fish scale’. Glaze 5 was very fluid. Glaze 6 was more satin and opaque with the dolomite content contributing a ‘buttery’ quality. Glazes 7 & 8 were a typical celadon. The next step was to fire the glazes at different temperatures. Three iron variants of each glaze (base, 1.5 & 3%) were fired to cones 6 & 7 with the results considerably more satin. At Cone 6 all glazes were immature. Glazes 4 to 8 crawled where the application was thicker, and colour development was poor. Cone 7 firing gave a smoother satin finish - particularly glazes, 5, 7 & 8 which had celadon qualities earlier.

1. Feldspar 70
Silica 20
Whiting 10
From Harrison (1999)  

2. Feldspar 80
Silica 10
Whiting 10
LYN-SAN3
3. Granite Powder 21
Feldspar 28
Whiting 15
Lithium carbonate 1
Kaolin 3
Silica 26
Soft Wood Ash 5
Yellow Ochre 1
Recipe 3 is from Grebanier’s CEL#7 (p36). 1975
He gives a typical chemical analysis of the granite powder and wood ash which I used in a Seger formula conversion to ideal formulae of more common commercial glaze materials

The final four recipes are from Wood (1999). The first two are based on chemical analysis of Ru ware (the northern Song forerunner of Guan) and the final two Guan.
5.Feldspar 35
Kaolin 19
Silica 18
Whiting 15
Dolomite 10
Bone Ash 1.5

LYN-SAN1

LHS Top - Glaze 5
LHS Bottom - Glaze 6
RHS Top - Glaze 7
RHS Bottom - Glaze 8
(all base glazes blended with 0.5 -
3% iron oxide in
0.5% intervals)

4. Feldspar 63
Silica 10
Whiting 6
Talc 10
Bone Ash 6
Kaolin 5
from Daly (1995)  

 

6.Feldspar 25
Kaolin 24
Silica 27
Whiting 15
Dolomite 8
Bone Ash 1.5

7.Feldspar 34
Kaolin 18
Silica 27
Whiting 21

8.Feldspar 27
Kaolin 21
Silica 29
Whiting 19
Dolomite 3
Bone Ash 1

The glazes chosen for further testing were Glaze 3 with its three variants - base, 1.5% & 3% iron increments to give white, medium and dark chun blues; Glaze 6 (closest to the satin guan style) and Glaze 7 for a deep green celadon.

These glazes were tested with different fluxes by substituting soda felspar, nepheline syenite and wollastonite for the potash felspar in each recipe. To each flux substitution 5% barium carbonate, then 5% Frit 4194 was added. The wollastonite produced a dry glaze in glazes 3 & 7 becoming slightly more satin with the addition of the frit. Glaze 6 changed to a clear, fluid glaze with a stringy almost ash effect. All flux substitutions in glaze 6 altered the satin quality to a transparent glaze. Glaze 3 lost its blue colouration with the use of soda felspar & nepheline syenite, reverting to a transparent iron green. Fluidity was increased with the barium and frit additions. Glaze 7 was least affected by the flux substitutes.

The final testing were line blends of talc and dolomite to glaze 3 (base, 1.5% & 3% iron) to gauge the effects of magnesia. Materials were added in 3% increments up to 12%. Talc had little effect on the iron bearing variations of glaze 3 until 9% when the glaze became distinctly satin and lost its blue colouration. In the base, additions of 3 - 6% gave a slightly luminous grey-blue which became a satin flat white at increments of 9% and above.

Glaze 3 base with a 4% talc addition gave a glaze with a distinct pale blue cast - even on white porcelain and intensifying on a red body - due to the interaction of the magnesia and bone ash. The dolomite line blend, which contributed the flux, calcium, as well magnesia, gave more fluid, though similar, results.

LYN-SAND

Top tile from left: Glaze 1 - Base, 1.5% & 3% iron oxide
Glaze 2 - Base, 1.5% & 3% iron oxide

LYN-SAN4

Flux substitutions
From left: 1.5% iron oxide, 3% iron oxide, + 5% barium carbonate + 5% Frit 4194
Top tile: Soda Feldspar
Middle tile: Nepheline Syenite
Bottom tile: Wollastonite

Application & Firing

I experimented with glaze application methods including dipping, spraying and pouring.

All the glazes worked best with a thick application. Crawling in some glazes was overcome to a certain extent by calcining a proportion of the clay in the glaze. In final firings I increased the temperature to Orton Cone 10 for the white body. This gave livelier colour in the iron blues; while Cone 10 - 11 for the red body gave intense colour by enhancing body - glaze interaction. These glazes coped with a fairly standard 8 - 10 hour firing cycle with at least four hours in the reduction phase to smooth the glaze over and develop colour.

I would like to thank Mr Greg Daly and staff of the Canberra School of Art for their assistance.

I can be contacted at the Ceramics Workshop, Jam Factory Contemporary Craft & Design
PO Box 10090, Adelaide BC, SA 5000)
or by e-mail sanderson_lyn@hotmail.com.
Daly, G: Glazes & Glazing Techniques: a glaze journey
Kangaroo Press, Kenthurst NSW 1995 Grebanier, J: Chinese
Stoneware Glazes Watson - Guptill Publ, New York 1975
Harrison, S: ‘Guan, but not forgotten’ Pottery in Australia
Vol 38 #3 Sept 1999 Wood, N: Chinese Glazes: their origins,
chemistry and recreation A & C Black London 1999

More glaze articles in the Technical archive